Healthy Together Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261980408
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2011
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
Phone
8138499355
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Support Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$33,375
Expenses
$24,573
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To develop programs and promote advocacy to make wellness a community priority in the tampa bay area through collaboration with other organizations and local businesses. We want to make the healthy choice the easy choice. Regrettably, insufficient funding for projects forced healthy together to close its doors at the end of the fiscal year.

What it reported doing in 2011

Community wellness1. Prime time sister circles - african american women are dying prematurely of chronic disease at a rate higher than any other population in america. To counter that, healthy together enlisted a proven, evidence-based program designed specifically for these women (40-70 years old) to help them learn how to manage their personal wellness. Developed by dr. Marilyn gaston & dr. Gayle porter, the ptsc program uses esteem-building support groups to motivate participants to make changes critical to their personal lifestyle. Healthy together received partial funding for a round of circles in 2011, but was not able to secure sufficient additional funding to support the program. The restricted funding was returned to the grantors.2. Prime time sister circles alumni - once the women have graduated from the ptsc program, they found a strong need and desire to continue expanding their wellness knowledge - not only for their own wellness, but that of other sisters, their family and their community. Healthy together supported the local founding of the prime time sister circles alumni in the tampa area, working with drs. Gaston & porter to develop and refind their program nationally.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 61% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.9%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 90.8%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.4%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -75.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -67.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -54.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.9% of revenue deployed · 90.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2011
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.