Healthy Spark
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822422303
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Nashville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6159188700
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Congregate Meals
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $139,735
- Expenses
- $139,735
- Assets
- $29,194
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Shlomo Rothstein (President)
People named in this filing
- Gabriel Wood-Isenberg (Treasurer)
- Shlomo Rothstein (President)
- Nechama Rothstein (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of Healthy Spark is to provide an otherwise unavailable Kosher meat option for students at Vanderbilt University and the surrounding Nashville area. This allows customers to maintain a Jewish connection on campus and have warm interactions with a Jewish organization.
What it reported doing in 2025
We served approximately 5500 students with a total of 12254 transactions in the 2024 fiscal year and intend to continue growing in our service and impact.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 36.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -54.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 32.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.