Healthy Living Projects Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204434490
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Overland Park, KS, USA
Phone
9133020027
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
AIDS

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,843
Expenses
$78,142
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Hollister S Pittman (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Randall Fowler (Chief Financial Officer)
  • Randall Burge (Board Member)
  • Hollister S Pittman (Executive Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide HIV/STD testing, outreach and prevention education to the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Healthy Living Projects (HLP) continues to be the only AIDS service organization in Johnson County, Kansas. HLP collaborates with the Johnson County Health Department to provide prevention and HIV testing in Johnson County, Kansas. Over the past year, HLP has expanded outreach testing to Leavenworth, Miami, and Wyandotte counties in Kansas. From January 1st to June 30, 2024, 109 people were tested. With those tested there was a positivity rate of 0.9% HIV, a decreased number from 2023.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 93
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 6
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 81

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -66.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 30.5%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $63K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.