Healthy Family Services of Texas Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934188934
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Mckinney, TX, USA
Phone
2143077574
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,268,535
Expenses
$1,304,445
Assets
$99,917
Liabilities
$75,424

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES TIPPIT (President)
  • Richard Riccardi (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • GERE FELTUS (Executive Dir.): $300,000 total reported compensation
  • Dusten R Cardinal (Physicians Assist.): $152,132 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide high-quality, evidence-informed healthcare services to individuals and families, regardless of their ability to pay.

What it reported doing in 2025

Primary Care Services: Healthy Family Services of Texas provided comprehensive primary care services to underserved individuals and families, regardless of ability to pay. The organization has now served approximately 735 unique patients and completed over 1930 patient visits in the past year. Services included preventive care, chronic disease management, wellness exams, and acute care visits. The clinic operates on a sliding fee scale to increase accessibility for uninsured and underinsured individuals in the Lewisville area. Federally Qualified Health Center Look-Alike Development: In preparation for Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Look-Alike designation, Healthy Family Services of Texas invested in capacity building, including strategic planning, compliance implementation, community needs assessments, and administrative infrastructure. These efforts lay the groundwork for expanded services, improved patient access, and sustainable funding models aligned with HRSA requirements.Service Expansion: Womens Health, Pediatrics, and Behavioral Health: The organization initiated the development of integrated care programs, including OB/GYN and behavioral health services. This expansion is designed to meet significant unmet needs in the region. Activities included facility readiness, staff recruitment, partnership development, and community engagement to ensure equitable access to care for women, children, and those facing mental health challenges.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.7%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 69.7%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.8%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.75; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 34.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 53.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 41.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -57.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.7% of revenue deployed · 69.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $910K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $300K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.