Healthinsight of Nevada

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
522347096
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Phone
8018920160
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,606,181
Expenses
$8,910,840
Assets
$2,668,703
Liabilities
$1,143,771

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Healthinsight Nevada is a private, non-profit community based organization dedicated to improving the healthcare system of Nevada. Healthinsight Nevada is the agency for healthcare research and quality, designated chartered value exchange, the medicare quality improvement organization, and the health information technology research extension center in Nevada.

What it reported doing in 2012

Quality improvement activities: through our quality improvement efforts, healthinsight works with medicare providers to improve the healthcare system and quality of care for patients. We provide technical assistance to providers in hospitals, nursing homes, home health agencies and physician offices supporting improvement in processes and outcomes of care. Areas of focus include: assisting physician offices with the adoption and implementation of electronic health records (ehr) technology, working in multiple settings to identify opportunities to increase efficiency and enhance patient safety, and assisting in interventions impacting clinical issues such as pneumonia, heart failure and diabetes. We also promote the use of publicly supported data around these areas to make visible healthcare system performance and to enhance quality improvement efforts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.2%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 43.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 95.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $360K · 19 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2012
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.