Healthcare Leadership Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
393245892
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Dover, DE, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Health Support Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,361
Expenses
$32,977
Assets
$28,722
Liabilities
$338

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Daniel Allyn (President)
  • Dean C Taylor (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Daniel Allyn (President)
  • Blake Long (Secretary)
  • Anthony Fuller (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Healthcare Leadership Foundation HLF develops inspires and supports ethical leaders of character committed to serving others advancing patient-centered healthcare promoting health and enhancing societal well-being. Our vision is a healthcare system led by compassionate capable and collaborative physicians who create high-performing teams and deliver care that honors both science and humanity.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Healthcare Leadership Foundation HLF exists to develop inspire and support leaders of character dedicated to serving others advancing patient-centered healthcare promoting health and enhancing societal well-being. Over the next five years HLF will focus on building depth and excellence in leadership development programs establishing strong institutional partnerships and creating a sustainable organizational and financial foundation that enables long-term impact.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46.3%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.