Health Professionals for a Healthy Climate
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883379421
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6125643478
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Environmental Education and Outdoor Survival Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $317,816
- Expenses
- $173,297
- Assets
- $531,488
- Liabilities
- $404
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELLEY SKUMAUTZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KELLEY SKUMAUTZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $72,359 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Health professionals for a healthy climate inspires and activates health professionals to address climate change through inter-professional education, clinical practice, and public advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Hphc educates health professionals, the public, and policymakers, and we promote a climate equity policy agenda that dismantles existing environmental racism, creates a just and equitable transition to a carbon-free economy, and prioritizes investment in bipoc communities to create climate resilience and healthy lives for all minnesotans. Air quality impacts: climate change increases levels of major air pollutants including particulate matter, ground-level ozone, and pollen, which can induce or aggravate cardiovascular disease and respiratory conditions like allergies, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung cancer. Via hphc, engaged health professionals are actively involved in closing down a hennepin county trash incinerator and other polluting industries. Hphc is also addressing the health impacts of wildfire smoke and the implementation of mn's cumulative impacts law which enforces stricter emissions standards.advancing resilient & climate-ready healthcare: hphc is moving Minnesota's health systems towards sustainable practices by developing and launching educational campaigns to inform leaders about climate resilient operations and cost-savings that result. We help implement projects that focus on climate adaptation and mitigation strategies for health professionals, patients, and health systems alike.clinician empowerment: through in-person and online continuing education opportunities, professional support, peer connections, community-led learning, coalition and advocacy work, and personalized mentoring, and fellowship programming, health professionals gain and fine-tune their skills for individual action, legislative advocacy, systems change, and supporting local climate justice efforts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 50
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37.6%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 68.8%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.5%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.07; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 41.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 58.5% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -39% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 31.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 37.6% of revenue deployed · 68.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $119K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $72K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.