Health Goes Global Hannah E Akre 7 Picardy Lane

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455334485
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
St Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3142312573
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$28,455
Expenses
$33,628
Assets
$56,369
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • HANNAH E AKRE (EXECUTIVE DI)
  • GENEVA E STOLZE (CO-FOUNDER)
  • BETSY ASSOUMOU (CFO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To protect the livelihood of healthcare workers and patients they serve by promoting healthcare efforts; promoting and facilitating preventative healthcare practices throughout the world for healthcare workers, their patients, and the communities they serve.

What it reported doing in 2024

Indonesia - 15,000 partnering with surge for water construction of rainwater collection tank and toilets for clean water, sanitation and safe hygiene for the sumbetengah children's school. Senegal & kenya - 3,000 providing birthing kits and education to women about complications with pregnancy working with partners for world health to reduce infant mortality rates. Panama - 3,000 supporting sustainalbe healthcare, including primary care, emergency care, dental care and health education, brought to 32 remote ngabl communities with floating doctors. Sudan - 2,000 syria humanitarian relief fund for vital medical equipmnet and supplies, pharmaceutials and personal protective equipment. Nepal - 10,000 support for the kopila valley clinic and mental health and family support clinic with blink now in the poverty-striken villages providing preventative and primary care and basic health education to 420 students served by the clinics.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 75.8%; rating input score 76; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18.2%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.68; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.