Health for All Mission

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
161677287
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Laguna Beach, CA, USA
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Reported finances

Revenue
$153,087
Expenses
$153,087
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Angelina Joseph (Executive director)

People named in this filing

  • Angelina Joseph (Executive director)
  • Guy Biack (International director)
  • Rev Suzanne Adjeme (Program director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Health for All Mission plead the cause of the poor and needy by providing assistance and resources in the areas of Health Education Environment Women empowerment to rural communities in Africa and Central America

What it reported doing in 2025

Food security program: HFAM provides to feed kids being at risk of being hungry and not having the adequate nutrition they need. Our feeding centers serve as safe havens for children at-risk. have experienced the nightmare of abuse while others are loved but forced to work due to extreme poverty. Many kids are largely neglected because their parents work long hours some are physically disabled or make their living by other survival means. Sometimes the children work long hours themselves on the farm. Total of meal served= 638 100% benefited from the program and growing stronger and healthier

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 73%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 34.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -75% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 73% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $112K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.