Health For All Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942747710
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9164412811
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,631,695
- Expenses
- $3,067,052
- Assets
- $523,886
- Liabilities
- $1,238,195
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Chuck Wiesen MBA (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
Highest reported compensation
- Sa Vang (MD): $133,846 total reported compensation
- Chuck Wiesen MBA (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer): $60,500 total reported compensation
- Gustavo Rosales MD (Chief Medial Director): $20,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Health for All, Inc. providers health services to the elderly and the poor through a team of health care providers offering primary health care, social supportive services, and other needed health care services to the Sacramento Community particularly the Medi-Cal, uninsured, and others with limited access to care. Services are available without regard to ability to pay.
What it reported doing in 2014
Health for All, Inc. is a team of health care providers offering primary health care, social supportive services, and other needed health care services to the Sacramento Community particularly the Medi-Cal, uninsured, and others with limited access to care. Services are available without regard to ability to pay.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 84% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.5%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.36; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $134K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.