Health-e-citi-nj

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272434773
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Jersey City, NJ, USA
Phone
2019152000
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Health, General and Financing

Reported finances

Revenue
$388,606
Expenses
$388,171
Assets
$2,258,608
Liabilities
$2,254,991

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Health e-citi-nj is bringing together the newark community care givers as well as the garden state and surrounding regional healthcare industry stakeholders. These stakeholders will participate in an open network addressing issues related to improving the quality of patient care while working towards regional coordination of and compliance with hipaa, nj hint, and applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations. Our mission in addressing emerging issues in our community related to healthcare information technology, applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations and is to build a network with the following considerationscommon vision and purposegovernance other stakeholder participation (pbms, labs)collaboration and competition focus and priorities benefits and value to stakeholders financial feasibility data sharing agreement privacy and security

What it reported doing in 2012

Developing software which will be installed at and used by a network of hospitals to improve the quality and coordination of health care. This will improve measurable outcomes and facilitate the exchange of healthcare information, while reducing costs of care by reducing duplicity of services for the residents and access to important information for the residents of the city of newark, a significant portion of which are not or underinsured, and its surrounding areas. This will tangibly improve care to the significant medicaid eligible population served by the participating entities and providers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.82; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $334K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.