Health Care for All Oregon
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931306043
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5032066709
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $316,487
- Expenses
- $302,941
- Assets
- $138,485
- Liabilities
- $16,484
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VALDEZ BRAVO (PRESIDENT)
- ANTONIO GERMANN (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VALDEZ BRAVO (PRESIDENT)
- ANTONIO GERMANN (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- KEVIN GEOFFROY (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Hcao educates about and advocates for an equitable, affordable, comprehensive, high-quality publicly funded universal healthcare system that will improve the lives of individuals, families and communities across Oregon and throughout the USA.
What it reported doing in 2025
Hcao increases awareness about the inequities in access to healthcare and educated the public about opportunities to have a voice in addressing these inequities. Volunteers advocated for policies to increase access to healthcare based on a set of values and principles. Hcao increased its members and endorsers and collaborated with project access now (panow) and other organizations. Hcao counts among its accomplishments working to inoculate the public against misinformation intended to confuse and mislead the public's understanding of universal health care, producing an informational monthly newsletter and engaging with chapters, faith groups and unions statewide. Hcao continued to diversify its board in alignment with our equity principle.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.4%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 49.5%; rating input score 49
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.46; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47.4% of revenue deployed · 49.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $150K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.