Health Assistance Intervention Education Network for Ct Health Professionals Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510642913
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- East Berlin, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8608283175
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health, Crisis Intervention N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,501,754
- Expenses
- $1,586,452
- Assets
- $3,453,373
- Liabilities
- $58,866
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- THOMAS CALNON DDS (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- STEPHEN CARRABBA BS (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARIELLA LAROSA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- MARIELLA LAROSA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $270,205 total reported compensation
- JANA PLASKY (FINANCIAL CONTROLLER): $106,618 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enhance patient safety by supporting the health and well-being of ct health professionals. Haven offers a confidential alternative for healthcare professionals facing the challenges of chemical dependency, emotional or behavorial disorders or physical and mental illness. Haven is a resource for healthcare professionals to seek help before patient harm occurs without fear of public disclosure or public regulatory action.
What it reported doing in 2025
Haven accomplishes its mission through (1) education and prevention, (2) early identification and intervention, (3) referral for evaluation and treatment, and (4) support and accountability. In 2025, 339 professionals benefitted from services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 69.8%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.6%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.18; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75% of revenue deployed · 69.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $270K · 15 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.