Health Alliance Plan by Henry Ford Health

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
382242827
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Detroit, MI, USA
Phone
(888) 447-3850 (TTY: 711)
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Group Health Practice (Health Maintenance Organizations)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,636,128,583
Expenses
$1,609,912,895
Assets
$703,335,429
Liabilities
$332,309,199

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

31 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL A GENORD MD (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT (THRU 11/2024))
  • MARGARET ANDERSON (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT (START 11/2024))

Highest reported compensation

  • ROBERT G RINEY (DIRECTOR): $7,081,174 total reported compensation
  • ADNAN R MUNKARAH MD (DIRECTOR): $3,443,767 total reported compensation
  • ROBIN S DAMSCHRODER (TREASURER): $3,410,190 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide access to quality health care coverage. Brokers and providers will see an updated name, look and set of materials, but the relationships and people behind them stay the same. Here's what to expect: Updated sales and enrollment materials will be available ahead of open enrollment, including refreshed collateral, presentation decks and digital assets. They will also see an updated website that reflects our new name. Account representatives, broker support contacts, provider networks, plan structures and contract terms all remain the same. Learn more Coverage and care connected.

What it reported doing in 2024

Corporate overviewhap is a subsidiary of henry ford health one of the nation's leading health care systems. Hap provides coverage to individuals, companies and organizations. We partner with doctors, employers and community groups to improve the overall health of every community we serve. Our mission is to enhance the health and well-being of the lives we touch.company highlights: founded in 1960 based in detroit, Michigan 419,994 members and 900 plus employeesin august 2023, hap and caresource, an Ohio-based nonprofit managed care health plan, entered into an agreement to form a joint venture. The goal of the joint venture is to bring high-quality coverage to more Michigan residents. This positions henry ford health and the joint venture in an extremely strong strategic position for a successful medicaid procurement, statewide medicaid growth, and re-entry into the on-exchange individual market. Hap is a full-service health insurance company with distinct product portfolios: employer group plans hmo, ppo, epo, narrow network and consumer-driven health plans. Health engagement program offers employees incentives to adopt a healthier lifestyle. Individual plans hap plans hmo, ppo and health savings account are for individuals and families not covered through employer health insurance. Medicare hap medicare solutions offer hmo and ppo health plans, prescription drug plans and medicare supplement plans for individuals and employer-sponsored employees and retirees. Medicaid hap empowered health plan is an hmo based in southeast Michigan with about 33,383 enrollees. Self-funded aso and asr health benefits offer competitive options for employers and health and welfare funds seeking to self-fund their health benefit costs. Network leasing hap preferred, inc. Is a ppo network that can be administered by third-party administrators and health and welfare funds.participating physicians and ancillary providers: hap's robust provider networks include the leading Michigan doctors, hospitals, and health systems.hap contracts with more than 50,000 provider partners and 88 plus Michigan hospitals to serve its members. Statewide and national provider network solutions are available for other product lines through strategic partnerships for companies with multiple locations. Hap expends a considerable amount of resources communicating with members and providing supportive health programs and resources to help them achieve sustainable healthy habits and manage chronic conditions. Examples of health and wellness programs and resources include: preventive and wellness services: hap covers preventive services, including cancer screenings, physicals, flu shots and more. Worksite wellness programs: free or low-cost preventive services and health education for the workplace. Istrive for better health: online health assessment and digital coaching. Easy-to-understand educational tools: we help members manage their plan benefits and overall health.community outreach overview & initiativesestablishing and managing relationships with non-profit organizations that support community health and well-being is an integral part of the mission and vision of hap's community outreach department. 2024 activities and accomplishments in community outreachkey initiatives: establish and manage relationships with human service agencies and non-profit organizations that support community health and well-being. Support programs at senior centers, area agencies on aging and veterans affairs organizations to keep the hap brand top of mind among medicare advantage prospects. Develop and present member engagement activities to aid in retention for all lines of business. Partner with henry ford health, other contracted providers and enrolled employer groups to present community events and member engagement activities. Collaborate with hap hcm and quality teams to produce and execute "clinic days" to close gaps in care for medicaid members. Identify, promote, and coordinate hap

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 90% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 80
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.7%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 98.4%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97%; rating input score 97; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 81.2%; rating input score 81; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.47; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.4%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 95.7% of revenue deployed · 98.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6B in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $7.1M · 31 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $25.2M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 60 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.