Healing The Hero USA Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 992484192
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Winter Haven, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8632216304
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,767
- Expenses
- $41,454
- Assets
- $15,313
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Daniel Jarvis (President)
- Abel Rodriguez (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Daniel Jarvis (President)
- Abel Rodriguez (Vice President)
- Tammy Laird (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Healing the Hero USA Inc. is a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the cognitive performance, resilience, and overall well-being of veterans, active-duty military personnel, first responders, and their families.The organization provides access to innovative trauma recovery and emotional resiliency training designed to help individuals process critical incidents and restore optimal functioning. Through education, peer-support frameworks, and structured resiliency protocols, Healing the Hero empowers individuals to regain emotional balance, improve decision-making under stress, and maintain long-term mental and physical wellness.Healing the Hero seeks to reduce suicide, chronic stress injuries, and long-term health consequences associated with occupational trauma by equipping participants with practical tools that promote resilience, clarity, and sustained performance.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization facilitated trauma resiliency training programs designed to help participants process significant emotional events and regain cognitive clarity following critical incidents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.