Healing Justice Collective

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853437627
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Honolulu, HI, USA
Phone
3104904227
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,903
Expenses
$27,063
Assets
$149
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • Jessica Gray (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the Healing Justice Collective is to resource Black, Indigenous, Identifying People of Color, and historically oppressed people, in their healing around emotional, physical, spiritual, and mental well-being.

What it reported doing in 2022

*Fund healing sessions for 280 recipients. *Fund 10 Community Healing Workshops and 11 Classes *Fund educational content to over 8,000 recipients through conference presentations, health summits, base building meetings, community talks, and instagram live series, featuring BIPOC practitioners, organizers, educators, teachers, and facilitators. *Fund $2,000 in BIPOC Reimbursement Grants for 1:1 therapeutic services. (granted and disbursed in 2022) *Fund $4,000 in COVID Relief Grants to BIPOC practitioners to better support their BIPOC clients during this pandemic. *Fund $20,000 in general operations grants for BIPOC & LGBTIA+ practitioners (granted and disbursed in 2022)

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.1%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 66.5%; rating input score 67

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -29.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -76.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -84.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -190.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.1% of revenue deployed · 66.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.