Healing Hope Cat Sanctuary
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352417152
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- San Clemente, CA, USA
- Rating
- 92
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,077
- Expenses
- $49,092
- Assets
- $243
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kimberly A Rockshaw (President)
- Katherine Parker (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Kimberly A Rockshaw (President)
- Katherine Parker (Vice President)
- Cheryl Ann (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
SEE SCHEDULE O. . . . I could not check the box above!!! Help community and citizens by rescuing and removing stray cats. Also help individuals who can no longer keep their pet cats and need a place to take these animals that is not a public high kill shelter. We also on occasion remove cats from high kill shelters. We provide vet care and in many instances adopt out any suitable cat that has come to us. SEE SCHEDULE O.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ongoing: Care and maintenance of the entity we call "Healing Hope Cat Sanctuary". The cats we take in are mainly permanent residents plus there are a few cats that are until they can go to a home or another rescue. We care for every aspect of their life from housing property maintenance to feeding to medial care and adoption. Since many of the cats we take in are unadoptable and cannot be handled or cared for by other feline rescue groups many of the cats stay here from the time of rescue until the time they die. More info is included in SCHEDULE O
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -27.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -28% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $49K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.