Healing Hearts Worship Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300541923
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Upper Marlboro, MD, USA
- Phone
- 2406199346
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $289,760
- Expenses
- $99,415
- Assets
- $116,243
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- SHERITA EDWARDS (35)
- VALARIE WADDY (TREASURER)
- ALONTE EDWARDS (PROGRAM DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To nbsp; empower nbsp; individuals nbsp; in nbsp; a nbsp; religious nbsp; environment nbsp; through nbsp; worship nbsp; outreach nbsp; ministry nbsp; programs nbsp; mental nbsp; health nbsp; awareness nbsp; and nbsp; life nbsp; and nbsp; job nbsp; skills nbsp; preparation
What it reported doing in 2022
Conferences for mentl health awareness and life skills
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 24
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20.1%; rating input score 20
- Program expense ratio: 58.5%; rating input score 58
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 65.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -45.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 20.1% of revenue deployed · 58.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $74K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 12 of 13 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.