Healing Hearts Northwest
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452816701
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-T 2020
- Location
- Spokane, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5099916867
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Heart and Circulatory System Diseases, Disorders
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $325
- Expenses
- $20,992
- Assets
- $8,464
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HAL GOLDBERG (President)
- NEIL WORRALL (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- LISA CHAPMAN (MEMBER AT LARGE)
- K THOMAS CONNOLLY (MEMBER AT LARGE)
- SANDY GOLDBERG (MEMBER AT LARGE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide open heart surgery in countries where these services are currently unavailable, teach general cardiac care and treatment for cardiac emergiencies and jointly care for patients and collaborate with programs for early detection, prevention, and treatment of rheumatic heart disease.
What it reported doing in 2020
To provide open heart surgery in countries where these services are currently unavailable, teach general cardiac care and treatment for cardiac emergencies and jointly care for patients and collaborate with programs for early detection, prevention, and treatment of rheumatic heart disease.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 12
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6,359.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.4% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -19.4% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.