Heal and Thrive Global
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464454004
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Colorado Springs, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7193222273
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Economic Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $599,638
- Expenses
- $594,547
- Assets
- $184,768
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHASADY MIRKES (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BRANDI BERGREN (DIRECTOR): $50,653 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote justice and champion value for survivors of injustice and those that serve them around the world. We accomplish this through our long- standing partnership in uganda empowering 8,000+ women with the tools and resources they need to heal and thrive; namely safe community, literacy+ training, clean water and emergency medical care. Globally, we care for leaders of other nonprofits at no cost to them through curating experiences of rest and healing as well as providing training and coaching..
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025 a grant of 442,805 as awarded to destiny community development initiative, located in soroti, uganda. This funding supported various community development programs, including the establishment and operation of literacy centers, the provision of clean water wells, emergency medical funds, training and mentoring and providing for children who've lost their parents. These initiatives, based at plot 24 enyiku road in the eastern division of soroti, played a vital role in enhancing the quality of life for many individuals in the community and contributed to the long-term development of the area. Globally, we ran retreats and offered training and respite for leaders around the world fighting injustice.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 79% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.7%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $53.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Pass
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Pass
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.8%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.7% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $562K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $51K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.