Head Start Child Development & Family
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 591173706
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012
- Location
- St Petersburg, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7273278690
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,163,919
- Expenses
- $7,401,259
- Assets
- $356,246
- Liabilities
- $87,991
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's principal purpose is to operate child care facilities and provide services primarily designed to eliminate the difference between the culturally deprived and the culturally advantaged children. The organization provides comprehensive services to children with an emphasis on health, education, and social services for the entire family. All programs are geared to achieving total family involvement and the provision of services necessary for improvement of the general conditions of low-income families.
What it reported doing in 2012
In 2012 head start provided health, education, and social services to clients enrolled in the program. The organization served 664 three year olds and 901 four year olds and early head start served 39 early head start children and 161 early head start expansion children. Additionally, 103 children with disabilities were served including those with speech and language impairments who received specialized services. The services provided to clients are designed to promote school readiness as well as social development in the children served by the program as well as to assist the family unit in addressing its immediate needs by providing training in various areas such as parenting, personal and professional development, and job readiness. The organization also provides referrals to various community resources to assist families with addressing other identified issues that our organization does not provide specialized services in. The provision of the above services are provided to our clients to assist them in meeting their immediate needs as well as to aid in the development of strategies to address long range goals and needs of the family unit.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 89% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.3%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -37% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -91.5% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $52K · 33 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and related organizations
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2012
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.