Head Injury Association of Nd

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
450397549
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Bismarck, ND, USA
Phone
7012235996
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Brain Disorders

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,359
Expenses
$52,818
Assets
$30,167
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • APRIL FAIRFIELD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • MARY SIMONSON (CHAIRPERSON)
  • LISA ANDERSON (VICE CHAIRPERSON)
  • RHONDA BOEHM (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Head injury association of North Dakota (hiand) is an organization that provides resources to individuals, families, professionals, and the community regarding brain injury.

What it reported doing in 2013

The mission of the head injury association of North Dakota is to advocate, raise awareness, and provide resource and tools in order to enhance the quality of life for individuals and their families who have been affected by head injuries. Held on-going training of individuals and annual conference in 2013/2014.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.8%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 50.5%; rating input score 50

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -74%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -45.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -51.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -22.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.8% of revenue deployed · 50.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.