Hca Florida Kendall Medical Staff Inc C/o President of the Medical Staff

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
881756901
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Phone
3053058504
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$245,700
Expenses
$310,704
Assets
$119,369
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK MCKENNYMD (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • JOSE BARROS MD (VICE PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • JAVIER LOPEZMD (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • JESSICA QUINONESMD (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANA PINEDAMD (DEPARTMENT CHAIR-EMERGENCY): $36,000 total reported compensation
  • JESSICA QUINONESMD (PRESIDENT): $30,000 total reported compensation
  • BRAULIO SABATES MD (DEPARTMENT CHAIR-SURGERY): $20,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A. To promote medical education for physicians, allied health professional, and patients.b. To enhance the reputation of hca Florida kendall hospital.c. Promote research and development.d. To award scholarships.e. To provide medical supplies to the impoverished.f. To pay stipends to the officer of the medical staff of hca Florida kendall hospital for their expenditure of time and commitment on bahalf of the medical staff.g. To make gifts for scientific, charitable or educational purposes consistent with the above purposes.h. To do all such things and the transaction of such lawful business as is empowered to such corporation by the laws of the state of Florida.

What it reported doing in 2025

A. To promote medical education for physicians, allied health professional, and patients.b. To enhance the reputation of hca Florida kendall hospital.c. Promote research and development.d. To award scholarships.e. To provide medical supplies to the impoverished.f. To pay stipends to the officer of the medical staff of hca Florida kendall hospital for their expenditure of time and commitment on behalf of the medical staff.g. To make gifts for scientific, charitable or educational purposes consistent with the above purposes.h. To do all such things and the transaction of such lawful business as is empowered to such corporation by the laws of the state of Florida.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 51
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 80%; rating input score 80; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -26.5%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 65.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 0 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $311K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $36K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 15 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 8 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.