Hb Outpatient Rehabilitative Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813748483
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Jacksonville, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9043457600
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitative Medical Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $822,452
- Expenses
- $444,521
- Assets
- $2,490,882
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Douglas M Baer (Chairman / CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Douglas M Baer (Chairman / CEO): $902,095 total reported compensation
- J Britton Tabor (SEC. / TREAS. / CFO): $619,949 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enhance the health and well being of persons requiring rehabilitation services through superior outcomes and service.
What it reported doing in 2024
Halifax health and brooks health development partner to provide intensive rehabilitation in the Florida counties of volusia and flagler. The venture was created to collaboratively grow quality services for the patients of these counties. Brooks is the provider of clinical services for the five facilities of the joint venture. Brooks clinicians are highly trained to provide exceptional physical, occupational, and speech therapies. Halifax/brooks outpatient centers offer what few can - experience applying the best therapy to achieve the most complete recovery possible. Services utilize a combination of evidenced-based practice and innovative technology to treat the most complex and unique cases. Trained clinicians treat a wide range of both neurologic and orthopedic conditions that utilize evidenced-based treatments that focus on patient-centered care.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 62
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.9%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.6; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47.9% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $394K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $902K · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.