Hayrenaser

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453585627
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Glendale, CA, USA
Phone
8186028441
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,200
Expenses
$13,828
Assets
$2,492

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • NELLI MARTIROSYAN (CHAIRPERSON)
  • ARMENUHI PEPANYAN (SECRETARY)
  • LENA SIMONYAN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hayrenaser was formed for exclusively charitable and educational purposes, specifically, hayrenaser's mission and purpose are to provide aid and assistance to armenian and its population by educating. The general public about the country and its assistance needs, coordinating various programs and providing aid.

What it reported doing in 2024

The reconstruction of 3 rural schools in armenia was completed with no allocation of additional funds. This fulfilled hayrenaser's goal of providing specific, individual public infrastructure buildings(e.g. Schools, rural and medical centers/hospitals, kindergardens, etc) in the rural areas of armenia which are affected by either a lack of existing community resources or a lack of funding and supplies to existing public infrastructure. ( this activity, in its nature and scale/score, will not constitute"economic development" as difined in line 6a, part viii pf fprm 1023)

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 6
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 9.3%; rating input score 9
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -21.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -34.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 9.3% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.