Hawaiian Ranchos Community Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990237162
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Ocean View, HI, USA
Phone
8088540021
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$565
Expenses
$2,374
Assets
$152,184
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Bobbi Wood (President / Treasurer)
  • Mona Yamada (Vice President / Director)

People named in this filing

  • Bobbi Wood (President / Treasurer)
  • Linda Raquinio (Secretary / Director)
  • Mona Yamada (Vice President / Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Develop a community for safe, healthful, and harmonious living.

What it reported doing in 2025

Services provided to 1227 property owners. Educated and informed landowners and other interested people about the history and the natural beauty of the subdivision. Promoted the conservation of such beauty and history for future landowners in the subdivision to enjoy and appreciate. All landowners in the subdivision were updated with flyers mailed and emailed with history, current facts, benefits, and interesting topics. All services were provided with the currently held resources. Promoted and protected the collective and individual property and civic interests and rights of all persons, firms, and corporations owning property in the Hawaiian Ocean View Ranchos Subdivision, situated in the District of Ka'u, County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii, USA. Completed tasks as necessary to promote the general welfare of the residents and owners of any portion of the subdivision and their property interests therein. Cared for and maintained improvements and maintenance of gateways, public easements, and parking areas.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -320.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 64.1; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.