Hawaiian Monk Seal Recovery Team Oahu Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800307574
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Pearl City, HI, USA
Phone
8085618112
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,920
Expenses
$42,403
Assets
$12,035

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's primary purpose is to protect & perpetuate the endangered hawaiian monk seal through: (1) education through public events, school programs & media relations to increase the local community & visitor awareness of the hawaiian monk seal; (2) by developing, training and maintaining a volunteer network; & (3) by assisting federal, state and non government organizations' efforts in the recovery of the hawaiian monk seal in the wild.

What it reported doing in 2012

During 2012, the organization spent $38,143 in grant monies received from noaa. The primary objective of the grant monies is to enhance noaa's mission in the recovery of the hawaiian monk seal in accordance with marine mammal protection act and the endangered species act. The organization accomplished this by preventing disburstance of seals through public outreach and education during responses to monk seal events such as haul outs, molting, pupping, hookings and other injuries, sightings, relocations and husbandry via the recruiting, training & scheudling of volunteers to respond to the above events. The organization recruited and trained 210 volunteers who logged over 10,500 hours of volunteer beach response on the islands of oahu & molokai. The volunteers also manned booths at 11 fairs and other events and logged over 100 hours in school classrooms to present our educational dvd about the hawaiian monk seal. Seven volunteers were sent to the marine mammal center in marin, ca to receive advanced training in captive seal care. We also assisted noaa in their two bi-annual seal count days by recruiting, training & scheduling volunteer counters for those days.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.6%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 54% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.