Hawaii Alliance for Progressive Action
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465537123
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Kapaa, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8082129616
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,274,485
- Expenses
- $915,314
- Assets
- $1,787,819
- Liabilities
- $29,619
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- IKAIKA HUSSEY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ANNE FREDERICK (EXECUTIVE DI): $107,614 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Catalyze community empowerment and systemic change towards valuing people and aina ahead of corporate profits.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Hawaii alliance for progressive action (hapa) implements its mission through the following inter-connected program areas. By using this intersectional approach, hapa seeks to create a more environmentally, socially, and economically just Hawaii. Fair and sutainable food systems - hapa works to move forward Hawaii's transition to a more sustainable and secure food system.today, the movement to transition toward regenerative food systems remains the most robust area of hapas work, often in collaboration with the protect our keiki coalition and other partners working at the intersection of regenerative agriculture, indigenous food systems, and environmental justice. Community-based stewardship - by supporting customary land-based organizing, protection and restoration of sacred sites and traditional food systems. Hapa has engaged in various campaigns across the pae`aina to restore healthy streamflow mauka to makai. On kauai, hapa works closely on the campaign to support the restoration of the north fork of the wailua river. Social and economic justice - addressing structural ways that economic inequality is perpetuated, working towards a more level playing field for all. Hapa supports policies to provide a living wage for all workers in Hawaii, to tax real estate investment trusts (reits), to protect and increase affordable housing, to regulate vacation rentals, to support native hawaiians in receiving their fair share of the public lands trust, to increase funding for public schools and teacher salaries, and for tax fairness. We also support criminal-justice reform, such as bail reform, and moving toward restorative-justice models. Reclaiming democracy - by interrupting corporate influence on our government, restoring transparency, and citizen-driven democracy. In addition, the kuleana academy is an intensive non-partisan leadership development program for emerging community leaders interested in serving in public office. Academy participants receive campaign skills training as well as leadership development, media training, and immersion in Hawaii statewide issues.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $87.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.2%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.95; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.3% of revenue deployed · 93.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $852K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $108K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.