Havre Public Schools Education Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311719192
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Havre, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4063958550
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $170,286
- Expenses
- $117,635
- Assets
- $507,853
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
People named in this filing
- KYLE LEEDS (CHAIR)
- CASEY DONOVEN (CO-VICE CHAI)
- JOSEPH TODD (CO-VICE CHAI)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a tradition of excellence in support of th educational needs of students by raising, accumulating, and disbursing funds to improve, enhance and support the educational needs of the students of hill county district 16 and a.
What it reported doing in 2022
Small grants and awards distribution - the foundation makes micro and small grants (less than 1,500 usually). Grants may be requested by teachers and other district personnel.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 54% for direct work, and 46% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.3%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 90.8%; rating input score 91; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.9%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.32; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.3% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $115K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.