Haven of Rest Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261120258
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
Strawberry Plains, TN, USA
Phone
8655232614
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$156,530
Expenses
$156,455
Assets
$6,260
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Haven of rest ministries is committed to providing ministry, evangelism, education, food, and construction to and for the poor and needy in nicaragua.

What it reported doing in 2010

Project educate: through this activity, haven of rest provides children of nicaragua with school uniforms, supplies, and tuition. For 2010, haven of rest was able to provide assistance and support to more than 130 children.teams from the U.S.a: haven of rest ministries provides support, coordinate, and direction to volunteer teams from the U.S.a. That come to nicaragaua. These teams provide general education, clothing, medicine, toys, bible study, religious education, conduct crusades, and construction assistance. House construction and improvements: with this program, haven of rest ministries was able to build two houses and complete repairs on more than 14 other homes. Haven of rest ministries was assisted by teams from north america on short-term mission trips, providing financial support and construction labor.medical brigades: through this activity, haven of rest ministries takes doctors and dentists into rural areas of nicaragua to provide free medical care to those who have no facilities in their area. Las tias protection center: las tias is located in teh city of leon and provides assistance for 170 children. Haven of rest ministries provides this organization with cereal and milk for breakfast every morning along with discipleship and ministry to the children. Food bank: through this activity, several families receive food on a weekly or monthly basis. This is also used to feed those who serve as translators and volunteers to deliver food, medicine, and supplies to areas of great need. Mission house: the mission house, located in the city of leon, is used by groups and individual who volunteer to assist haven of rest ministries in all of their activities. Furthermore, this house is also used to keep, on a short-term basis, children and teenagers found to be in abusive situations, until permanent and safe housing can be found.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 41.3%; rating input score 41; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $156K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.