Haven of Our Lady of Peace Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593620346
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3147338000
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,951
- Expenses
- $2,917,992
- Assets
- $4,244,760
- Liabilities
- $362,868
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DON E KING (CEO, MINISTRY MARKET)
Highest reported compensation
- DON E KING (CEO, MINISTRY MARKET): $2,226,391 total reported compensation
- COBA SUSAN CORNEJO (COO, MINISTRY MARKET): $1,433,557 total reported compensation
- JALIMA TRANK (CFO, MINISTRY MARKET): $1,003,730 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care which sustains and improves the health of individuals and communities. We are advocates for a compassionate and just society through our actions and our words.
What it reported doing in 2024
This report illustrates the significant degree to which Haven of Our Lady of Peace, Inc. (The Haven) contributes to the positive health status of the communities it serves. With Sacred Heart Health System being a 51% owner of The Haven, The Haven is a member of Ascension Health, the nation's largest Catholic healthcare system. As such, The Haven continues to build and strengthen sustainable collaborative efforts that benefit the health of individuals, families, and society as a whole. The goal of The Haven is to perpetuate the healing mission of the church. The Haven furthers this goal through delivery of resident services, especially care to the elderly and indigent. Our concern for all human life and dignity of each person leads the organization to provide medical services to all people in the community without regard to the resident's race, creed, national origin, economic status, or ability to pay. The Haven has engaged in the following activities to ensure that our mission is accomplished: Unreimbursed Services Provided to the Elderly and the Poor The Haven provides a substantial portion of its services to the elderly and poor. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, approximately 65.38% of the value of services rendered was to elderly patients under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. In the spirit of principles adopted by Ascension Health, The Haven has taken proactive steps to address those issues that will affect accessibility, the financing, and the delivery of healthcare to all persons, especially the uninsured, underinsured, and the underserved. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, the estimated unreimbursed cost of services provided to the uninsured or underinsured totaled $730,324. Patient Services The Haven is a 120-bed skilled nursing facility. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, the Haven provided a total of 2,893 resident care days. Summary The Haven furthers its charitable purposes by providing a broad array of services to meet the healthcare needs of its residents. We provide essential medical services to the community and provide appropriate charity services and assistance to those residents who are not able to pay for their own healthcare needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 28
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 47.4%; rating input score 47
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18,193.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 47.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.2M · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $273K reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 377 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.