Have Art Will Travel Inc C/o Linda Stein

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
132926707
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2129646007
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$80,197
Expenses
$19,054
Assets
$187,590
Liabilities
$1,054

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LINDA STEIN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LINDA STEIN (PRESIDENT)
  • HELEN HARDACRE (TREASURER)
  • REBECCA SIEMENS SPOONER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire and empower people to live fearlesslya laboratory for social change, hawt fosters acceptance of evolvingexpressions of gender through artistic media and dynamic intellectualexchange.with art as a starting point, hawt empowers people to more easily reachtheir personal authenticity and, beyond themselves, accept diversity in others.with exhibits/lectures/performances and educational programs, hawtaddresses issues of oppression, including racism/sexism/ableism/homophobiaas seen through the lens of bullying.

What it reported doing in 2025

Interactive performances, exhibitions, readings, videos and lectures which open a dialogue as a laboratory of social change. It is currently exhibitiing artwork at 15 college venues over a 3 year period.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 25.6%; rating input score 26
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 76.2%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.85; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 25.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.