Haunted

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473637027
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Maple Valley, WA, USA
Phone
2068196111
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$135,698
Expenses
$54,348
Assets
$123,726
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ronald Sykes (President)

People named in this filing

  • Emily Strode (Secretary)
  • Kaethe Long (Treasurer)
  • Ronald Sykes (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

This corporation is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, and scientific purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations. Haunted exists to "coordinate fundraising activities for non-profit organizations via community events and attractions." The specific objectives and purpose of this organization shall be: a. To provide coordinated leadership in the areas necessary to design, construct, staff, market, and financially manage designated community events and attractions. b. To provide opportunities for youth and adult participants to develop skills in design, construction, staffing, customer service, marketing, business operation, and financial management. c. To partner with other non-profit groups in activities that promote the charitable, religious, educational, and scientific purposes of each organization.

What it reported doing in 2022

We successfully held our community event after a 2 year hiatus secondary to the pandemic. Our volunteers were largely new and with renewed effort and enthusiasm for the project. The grants and allocations were made at year end and not all had been fully transmitted as of the end of the tax year. Additional will show on the upcoming year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 58% for direct work, and 42% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.3%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 70.6%; rating input score 71

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 59.9%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.28; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 107.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28.3% of revenue deployed · 70.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $38K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.