Hatch Architects Design Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
862050388
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Dayton, OH, USA
Phone
9374794459
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,232
Expenses
$51,845
Assets
$6,856
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Alexandra Bohler (Board Chairman)
  • Joanne Mejias (Trustee)
  • Veronica Pochet (Trustee)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Focusing primary on the City of Dayton and Dayton Public School students, Hatch Architecture and Design serves to increase the diversity in the architecture profession and inspire young people to explore the profession and pursue it.

What it reported doing in 2025

This past summer, Hatch successfully completed several workshops in the community. Hatch returned to the Northwest Library for design-build summer programming for both K-6th graders and teenagers. The K-6th program was one week where students completed several hands-on design-build activities. The final project was constructing bird feeders from start to finish. Students chose a design, assembled the materials, and painted the bird feeder. The teen design-build workshop was a two week workshop in which the students designed and created several items to benefit the NW library. This includes ring toss games, cornhole boards, chess/checkers board, mobile book carts for the librarians, and a double sided mobile white board. The teen workshop concluded with a field trip to Frank Lloyd Wright's Wescott House. Additionally, Hatch partnered with the City of Dayton Recreation Centers, Abundant Life Church's summer programming, the Wescott Center, and the Scholars of H.O.P.E. after school program at Fairview elementary. Hatch provided a variety of hands-on design-build activities for students to engage in and utilize their creativity while learning about architecture. Survey data was collected from all programs to assist in strategic development going forward. Hatch also did a couple activities during the school year including two drop-in sessions with the Equity Center's after school program at Roosevelt Elementary School. Hatch led design workshops for high school students participating in AIA Dayton's student design competition. Stivers High School was the host with weekly sessions for six weeks, with the highest attendance of the past few years-about six students per session.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.2%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.