Harvison House Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 830535769
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,510
- Expenses
- $19,104
- Assets
- $2,205
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Adam Wade Harvison (Founder and President)
People named in this filing
- Adam Wade Harvison (Founder and President)
- Vanita Joy Harvison (Secretary)
- Richard Anthony Torrez (Founding Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Harvison House is a nonprofit organization serving military veterans and families who receive housing assistance i.e. low-income formerly homeless by providing home furnishings and medical equipment that they have been unable to acquire otherwise. We do this by reaching into our community for gently used furniture and equipment cleaning and repairing them and delivering to veterans homes. We work with case managers of other nonprofit or governmental organizations to identify the veterans and then contact the veterans directly to see what they need and schedule the deliveries.
What it reported doing in 2024
We have delivered several rooms of furniture to over 100 military veterans in our community this year making our total over 600 since our founding in late 2018. In addition we have separately delivered numerous individual items like medical beds and specialty chairs and have contributed items to other organizations serving veterans.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -52.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 40.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -16.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.