Harvest New England Assoc Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
522129529
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Hartford, CT, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Agricultural Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,208
Expenses
$10,598
Assets
$15,977

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARY JORDAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARY JORDAN (PRESIDENT)
  • GAIL MCWILLIAM JELLIE (TREASURER/SE)
  • REBECCA EDDY (MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Harvest new england (hne) is a cooperative marketing program created by new englands state departments of agriculture in 1992. The initial purpose of the program was to support the sale of new england-grown produce through supermarket channels. The program was subsequently opened to all new england food and agricultural products.

What it reported doing in 2021

Farms help give new england its special character. As new englanders, we recognize the importance of local food production and processing but sometimes take it for granted.the harvest new england program was created to make it easier for new englanders to identify locally produced food and agricultural products in their local supermarkets.when we purchase new england products, we contribute to the local agricultural economy, helping to ensure that future generations will be able to enjoy the beautiful new england farming community.harvest new england is a cooperative marketing program of new englands state departments of agriculture. Originally created to support the sale of new england-grown produce through supermarket channels, the program now includes all new england food and agricultural products.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.8%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.51; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -14.7% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.