Harvard Pilgrim Health Care of Connecticut Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461681667
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Hartford, CT, USA
- Phone
- 7812636000
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,117,996
- Expenses
- $26,414,734
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL A CARSON (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- BETH A ROBERTS (VICE PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL A CARSON (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR): $1,901,183 total reported compensation
- CHARLES R GOHEEN (TREASURER): $796,034 total reported compensation
- TISA K HUGHES (FORMER SECRETARY): $605,201 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule 0
What it reported doing in 2020
To improve the quality and value of health care for the people and communities we serve. During 01/01/2020 through 06/30/2020, harvard pilgrim health care of Connecticut, inc. Had 7,275 fully insured members, ambulatory encounters were 22,090 and hospital days incurred were 839.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 86% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most filed governance safeguards are in place. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 59
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -25.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 44.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.9M · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed
- Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.