Hart 2 Hart Christian Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811165096
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Lake City, FL, USA
- Phone
- (386) 466-1194
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Specialized Education Institutions
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,701,672
- Expenses
- $1,803,429
- Assets
- $1,072,394
- Liabilities
- $1,627,939
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DALLAS KEEN (PRESIDENT)
- RAY KEEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DALLAS KEEN (PRESIDENT): $84,500 total reported compensation
- RAY KEEN (VICE PRESIDENT): $48,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission at Hart 2 Hart Christian Academy, Inc. is to do whatever it takes to help children reach their full academic potential, develop a personal relationship with Christ, and instill social responsibility. Program nslp logo.png Hart 2 Hart Christian Academy Food Services serves the highest quality school meals, following the strictest food safety practices, providing students the nutrition necessary for success in the classroom while teaching them good eating habits that will promote a lifetime of good health. We serve serve breakfast and lunch. All students who attend H2HCA enjoy nutritional meals at no cost due to the National School Lunch Program School Food Service Managers: Marissa Cupp [email protected].
What it reported doing in 2024
The organizations purpose is to do whatever it takes to help children reach their full academic potential, develop a personal relationship with christ and instill social responsibility
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 97%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.52; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 30.6% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.