Harrison High School Megaphone Club Ltd
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 994815282
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Kennesaw, GA, USA
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $129,937
- Expenses
- $58,931
- Assets
- $71,106
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Deb Largen (President)
- Amanda Johnson (Vice President)
- Nichole Chavers (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Deb Largen (President)
- Amanda Johnson (Vice President)
- Nichole Chavers (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization is to promote and advance the Harrison High School (HHS) Cheerleading Program by providing support to the Principal, Athletic Director, and Team Coaches. This mission is carried out through the following efforts: encourage active parent and student involvement in the cheer program; promote attendance at cheer related functions; coordinate all supporting activities; raise funds to benefit all eligible HHS students; provide support for those services, facilities, and equipment not funded by the school; ensure recognition for the program and its cheerleaders.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization provided the funding for the competitive cheer team to attend an overnight travel competition, where the team received an award for placing 7th in the State of Georgia. Funding was also provided for the Game Day Team to attend an overnight competition, where they achieved a 29th place statewide ranking. In addition, the organization hosted an awards banquet for the athletes and their families, which included providing dinner, recognizing participants through participation awards, honor awards, and highest GPA awards. Two scholarships were also awarded to two graduating seniors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 54.6%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 43% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $56K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.