Harrison County Council on Aging Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341179698
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Cadiz, OH, USA
Phone
7409423238
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$814,555
Expenses
$405,178
Assets
$594,448
Liabilities
$2,729

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JIM THOMPSON (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • TAMMY VERHOVEC (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • TAMMY VERHOVEC (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $58,214 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are a non-profit senior center. We have a homemaking program to help keep the elderly safe intheir homes, a transportation program to transport seniors 60+ to appointments. We have a commodity box program that feeds 180 homes in harrison county and we also provide heap services to the residents of harrison county.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our transprotation services is provided by our three vans. One van is provided with a chair lift that can carry two wheelchairs and 4 clients. The other vans can transport 6 clients combined. We transport our clients with a donation policy, accepted only if the client can afford to do so. We take our clients to the grocery store, post office, bank, beauty solons, doctor appointments and other social activities. Homemaking services is a program for 60+ clients that need help staying in their homes. We provide cleaning of homes, running errands for the clients like grocery shopping and pharmacy pick ups with no cost to the client.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 35.9%; rating input score 36
  • Program expense ratio: 72.3%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $192.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 50.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.47; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.4%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 52.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 35.9% of revenue deployed · 72.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $293K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $58K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.