Harmony Labs Inc C/o Wework Lobby

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262506162
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2129667606
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Film, Video

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,216,233
Expenses
$4,758,798
Assets
$13,316,440
Liabilities
$190,673

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN WANIEWSKI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • BRIAN WANIEWSKI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $527,217 total reported compensation
  • FREDERICA CONREY (MARCOMM DIRECTOR): $250,567 total reported compensation
  • HIRAM P JOHNSON (SCIENCE DIRECTOR): $241,802 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Harmony labs aims to promote and advance research and understanding of how media influence works within society and partners with relevant stakeholders, including research, industry and media practicioners to address knowledge gaps and to experiment with and develop solutions that have positive social outcomes.

What it reported doing in 2024

Harmony labs is a media research lab, using science, data, and creativity to research and reshape our relationship with media. Our unique approach rests on a commitment to rigorous participatory public research, an unrivaled data platform, with transparent, principled data practices, and ongoing investment in exploration, invention, and creativity.we're building a community of private media companies that donate the data we need to understand what's going on in our media systems, and how they affect people, communities, and society as a whole. Our data philanthropy community includes big companies, like nielsen and comscore, and smaller startups, like peakmetrics, that are scraping different corners of the web, news, television, radio, and other kinds of media. This data philanthropy supports our research efforts including, for example, an adjacent community of academic researchers (harmony labs research network) who are using these data to study and improve media systems.in addition, we harness these industry and research relationships for our narrative observatory, a first-of-its-kind data tool that empowers content creators, advocates, and funders to find, reach, and resonate with the right audience in today's media minefield. The narrative observatory delivers audience-based insights, narrative and network analysis, and empirical validation of cultural strategy and content to our partners.we work with a wide range of partners on issues of existential importance, like climate, gun violence, political corruption, artificial intelligence, and more, using an approach to research that is rigorous, participatory, and 100% public. One of the first papers we co-authored looked at fracking narratives in documentary film. The outputs we've created with our partners include websites, presentations, peer-reviewed publications, toolkits, curriculum, interactives, white papers, and media. And our work has been covered in the press, including the New York time, wired and more.founded by john s. Johnson in 2008, harmony labs is a 501(c)3 incorporated in New York state. Funders include atlantic foundation, bill & melinda gates foundation, robert wood johnson foundation, john d. And catherine t. Macarthur foundation, open society foundations, nathan cummings foundation, google, and more.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 93
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 20.6%; rating input score 21
  • Program expense ratio: 74.6%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $26.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 72.4%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.8; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 35.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 20.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 20.6% of revenue deployed · 74.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $527K · 13 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $310K reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.