Harmony House Ministries Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
833708455
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,604
Expenses
$4,782
Assets
$2,822

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kendall Gourdine (Owner and President)
  • Tamra Milton (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Kendall Gourdine (Owner and President)
  • Jermane Milton (Owner)
  • Tamra Milton (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Harmony House Ministries Incorporated is to provide individuals within our community and abroad as a means of restoration and a sense of comfort. This is accomplished by hosting many community events that are free to the public. A few of these events for the 2022 year are as follows: -Neighborhood Night Out Back to School Block Party where we hand out many school supplies fed the public hosted a gospel concerts and provided nurses to administer COVID Vaccines. -The Way Homeless Feed where we provide backpacks of essential supplies to the homeless along with a filling meal

What it reported doing in 2021

The Way Community Homeless is a program initiative that we provided multiple times throughout the year. This organization provided food living essentials and one on one conversation with professional and licensed Counselors. This Program service over the year 2021 assisted a total of 1280 homeless individuals within the city of Wichita Kansas.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 34.6%; rating input score 35
  • Program expense ratio: 55%; rating input score 55

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 34.6% of revenue deployed · 55% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.