Harmony Dc Public Charter Schools
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465320551
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025297500
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,320,317
- Expenses
- $5,702,967
- Assets
- $4,990,608
- Liabilities
- $820,400
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MUHAMMET TURKAY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MUHAMMET TURKAY (CEO): $166,728 total reported compensation
- NIYAZI EVREN CULHA (PRINCIPAL): $161,593 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the charter school is to prepare students for higher learning in a safe, caring, and collaborative atmosphere through a quality learner-centered educational program with a strong emphasis on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
What it reported doing in 2024
Harmony public charter schools science, technology, engineering, and math (stem) program aims to prepare each student for higher education with a strong emphasis on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The program provides curriculum, instructional resources, and professional development for stem teachers. Harmony stem program is a part of harmony public charter schools academic department that involves a team of curriculum specialists, instructional coaches, and lead teachers in harmony public schools system. Harmony stem program has the following components: project based learning program (pbl): harmony provides curriculum, instructional resources, and pbl training to the teachers. Instructional administrators and stem coordinator support teachers on site to assist the implementation of pbl. Professional development: harmony believes that content-focused professional development is a critical need to ensure the quality of teaching science and mathematics. Our stem training model has two major components; the mastery of content knowledge and delivery of the content with effective instructional practices. Stem culture: the department also provides strategies and resources for schools to build stem school atmosphere connecting the students to higher education. We design a variety of opportunities for students to take stem education beyond the classroom and see how todays instruction connects to career and lifelong learning. Approach we are known for our project-based, hands-on approach to learning. Our approach is born out of the belief that kids learn best by exploring, discovering, and collaborating in carefully matched small groups. This is equally true in science and math as it is in english literature or art. This constructivist approach is a lot like tinkering. It encourages students to draw connections between disciplines and build on their previous experience. It gives them the time and space to test their ideas and to figure out how things in the world work. It shows them that you have to fail a lot in order to learn and that failure is at the heart of innovation and invention. This is the way 21st century skills are built. We believe that our small classrooms and collaborative learning style create an inviting, safe, and purposeful environment where students thrive. Walk into any classroom and you will see children peacefully solving their conflicts with the loving support of our dedicated teachers. Our behavioral expectations are clear and our students happily rise to meet them. Harmonys friendly and respectful atmosphere is contagious and carries on well after school is over. The school has an extended day model. Students receive an extra 5 hours of math and ela instruction weekly. Teachers are able to deliver data-driven, individualized, center-based instruction. Math and reading interventionists are able to meet academically struggling students twice a week in small groups or one-on-one to give intensive academic support to the students. Assessment we use amplifys dibels next and reading 3d, nwea's map, curriculum assessments, and bi-weekly tests to measure student growth and grade-level proficiency in math, reading, and language usage, taking a baseline at the beginning of the year and one at mid-terms. Progress monitoring assessments are used once a month to track student achievement more closely. The resulting data gives our teachers essential information about what each student knows so that they can create tutoring rosters, small groups, and targeted instructional plans to reinforce, develop, or introduce specific skills and concepts. Professional development continuous and embedded professional development is the key for raising student achievement and we take it seriously at harmony. Every wednesday afternoon our teachers collaborate in a professional learning community (plc) to share their struggles and what works in a focused and powerful way. Outside of the formal plc structure, our teacher
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 92.7%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.8%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81% of revenue deployed · 92.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $167K · 10 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $826K reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.