Harmony Coast Aquaculture Institute

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
873092394
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Arroyo Grande, CA, USA
Phone
8052942575
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Natural Resources Conservation and Protection

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,117
Expenses
$17,933
Assets
$27,458

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Don Chartrand (Executive Dir.)
  • Ben Ruttenberg (Treasurer)
  • Michael Graham (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's mission is to raise funds for the operation of the Harmony Coast Aquaculture Institute for the purpose of leasing plots with the facility for outreach, conservation, education research and commercial aquacultural activities. Specifically, Public and private enterprises dedicated to rebuilding depleted populations of endangered marine species, Private commercial aquaculture with local, native and naturalized species, commercial growers that meet the highest environmental industry standards. A significant portion of the facility is dedicated to restoration aquaculture to help rebuild depleted populations of endangered abalone and other important marine species.

What it reported doing in 2025

Attained master lease for conducting aquaculture activities at Alexander Ranch, acquired assets from the Abalone Farm Inc for conducing Aquaculture activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.8%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.1%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.53; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -53.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -67.3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -22.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.8% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.