Harmon High Pto

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460762617
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Aurora, OH, USA
Phone
2169268076
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$31,666
Expenses
$28,408
Assets
$59,051
Liabilities
$100

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Audrey Winkler (HHPTO President and Vice President AHS)
  • Katie Stump (Vice President of Harmon)
  • Erin Toler (Vice President of Marketing)

People named in this filing

  • Audrey Winkler (HHPTO President and Vice President AHS)
  • Katie Stump (Vice President of Harmon)
  • Erin Toler (Vice President of Marketing)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

It is the Harmon High PTO's mission and commitment to enhance the academic, social, and developmental experiences of all Harmon Middle School and Aurora High School students through collaboration with our school community.

What it reported doing in 2024

It is the primary purpose of this organization to develop and encourage a united effort by parents, teachers, school administration, and citizens of the Aurora school district toward a common goal of enhancing quality educational pursuits in the Aurora schools. The PTO is a not-for-profit organization that exists for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes, including the making of distributions to organizations and public schools that qualify as exempt organizations under section 501c3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Various academic and social programs and grants were given, benefiting the entire student body and staff of the middle school and high school.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 87% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Assets have declined or grown slowly and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.1%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.3%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.08; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $28K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.