Dream
Legal name: Harlem Rbi Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 134025290
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2127221608
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $40,912,146
- Expenses
- $40,752,370
- Assets
- $346,232,235
- Liabilities
- $267,482,365
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
42 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAWHNEY VIKRANT (CHAIRPERSON & PRESIDENT)
- SHEEHAN ROBERT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- WEISS DIANA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BERLIN RICHARD (CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- COLAVITO EVE (CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- BERLIN RICHARD (CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $583,525 total reported compensation
- COLAVITO EVE (CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $583,525 total reported compensation
- GRIFFIN MARIA (CHIEF ADVANCEMENT OFFICER (OUTGOING)): $368,543 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
DREAM ensures that all young people recognize their potential and realize their dreams. We level the playing field in our schools and communities by investing in the whole child from early childhood to early adulthood. DREAM’s mission fuels our “why,” serving as the overarching purpose of our work. Our maxims build on our mission, and are the core beliefs that guide our everyday practice. Why **DREAM Originally founded as Harlem RBI, DREAM traces its beginnings to 1991, when a group of volunteers transformed an abandoned, garbage-strewn lot into two baseball diamonds for the youth of East Harlem. Over three decades later, we serve thousands of children across East Harlem and the Bronx through a network of free, extended-day, extended-year DREAM Charter Schools and community-based youth programs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Program a: real kidsdream's real kids program provides free, high-quality afterschool and summer programming for children in grades k5 across east harlem and the south bronx. By combining academic instruction, sports-based youth development, and social-emotional learning, dream helps students build the skills and confidence to thrive in school and beyond. The program combats summer learning loss, promotes mental health and physical wellness, and fosters leadership and teamwork through structured play and enrichment. Program b: legendsdream's legends college and career readiness program serves dream charter high school graduates for six years after graduation through a one-on-one, case management model. Today, we operate a dual-track program that empowers students to pursue college or directly enter the workforce; and we provide them with the wrap-around support to succeed in their chosen pathway. The ultimate goal is for youth to pursue and complete a best-fit postsecondary path that equips them to fulfill their vision of success and achieve a career that facilitates stability and agency.program c: athletics, health and wellnessas harlem rbi was founded as a summer baseball league, health and wellness remains a core part of our organization today. Since then, we have expanded to include a host of other team-based activities as part of our offerings including basketball, soccer, lacrosse, swimming, dance, and so much more. In addition, harlem rbi invests in the mental and physical health of our students. We offer robust physical activity, mental health support services, and free, nationally recognized afterschool and summer sports-based programs that help our participants become confident, competent, and caring community members who know what it means to be part of a team.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 95.3%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.5; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 78.3% of revenue deployed · 78.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 31 of 31 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $584K · 42 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.4M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.