Harlem Lacrosse and Leadership Corporati

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
451634118
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2011
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
6175957500
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Physical Fitness and Community Recreational Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,741,163
Expenses
$8,533,273
Assets
$3,114,133
Liabilities
$245,002

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL LEVIN (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL LEVIN (CEO): $257,978 total reported compensation
  • KEISHA CALDERON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $155,815 total reported compensation
  • NARINE SUKYAS (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $142,378 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Harlem lacrosse is a nonprofit organization who works to empower youth from underserved communities by integrating academic support, mentorship, and lacrosse instruction. The organization provides year-round programming that combines in-school academic interventions, after-school enrichment, and summer programming with athletic training and mentoring.harlem lacrosse serves middle and high school students, focusing on academic achievement, personal development, and college readiness. Programming is delivered through partnerships with public schools and community organizations in the regions it serves. Services include academic tutoring, leadership development, social-emotional learning, college and career preparation, and organized lacrosse practices and competitions.the organization serves boys and girls from grades 6-12 at program sites in los angeles, New York city, baltimore, philadelphia and boston.

What it reported doing in 2024

The class of 2025 saw a cohort of 61 students graduate as harlem lacrosse student-athletes. These students benefited from up to seven years of athletic, academic, and social-emotional enrichment supported by a trusting relationship between the student, their family, and harlem lacrosse. Outcomes for this cohort are compelling, with 100% pursuing post-secondary education and earning a collective $1.6mm annually to aid in their persistence. These graduates join a growing an impressive harlem lacrosse alumni network that is starting to five back to the future generations of hl students.academic achievements: halrem lacrosse particpants are student-athletes, pursuing success on and off the field. This school year, participants continued to demonstrate academic success and growth. In a post-covid world, schools are finding chronic absenteeism rates to be a significant barroer to learning with a 28% chronic absenteeism rate nationally. Harlem lacrosse is supporting student-athletes in addressing chronic absenteeism. Participants who were chronically absent the year prior attended an average of six more days of school in 2024. Student-athletes' families shared that being part of hl improved academic motivation (90%) and academic performance (85%) in the classroom. Hl participants averaged an 80.8% gpa and most importantly, students who averaged below a 70% gpa last school year, showed an improvement of 15% in their gpa this school year. Students who struggled the prior academic year achieved the largest increases in their gpa this year.athletic achievements: lacrosse is at the core of everything we do. Our commitment to building lacrosse competency has enabled us to field competitive boys and girl's national teams that proudly feature elite players from all five harlem lacrosse regions}}}a testament to the athletic growth players experience within our program. Across the board this year, student-athletes saw tangible growth in their physical fitness. In partnership with the boston children's hospital, we measured the impact of our athletic programming. The pacer test is a maximal exercise test administered as a back-and-forth shuttle run. With progressive increases in pace, children complete as many laps as possible. Lap scores are interpreted using healthy fitness zone minimum standards. A score 100% indicates a child is in the healthy fitness zone. Youth in the hfz are less likely to develop metabolic syndrome, decreasing their risk for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. The numbers tell a compelling story: our participants' hfz scores increased significantly by an average of 29.8 percentage points over the 2023-24 school year. The most sizable improvements came from those starting with lower fitness levels (hfz<100), demonstrating our program's profound impact on vulnerable children with remarkable statistical confidence.social-emotional growth: a foundation of the harlem lacrosse model is a focus on supporting youth to develop critical social emotional skills and mindsets that help them to achieve their goals. This year, 94% of hl students grew in at least one of our five core areas of social emotional growth. 94% of families reported that their children improved relationships with their peers and 87% of families reported that their child had improved relationships with adults as a result of harlem lacrosse. Furthermore, 94% of families and 92% of school partners reported that harlem lacrosse and leadership their child developed a growth mindset as a result of harlem lacrosse. Harlem lacrosse plays a critical role in forging meaningful relationships in the lives of participants and building soft skills in the classroom, on the field, and in the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 62
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.5%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 69.2%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.2%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.5% of revenue deployed · 69.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $258K · 23 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.