Harlem Educational Activities Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133568672
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2126639732
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,967,395
- Expenses
- $3,300,161
- Assets
- $3,586,039
- Liabilities
- $3,157,101
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL C JOHNSON (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL C JOHNSON (PRESIDENT & CEO): $322,806 total reported compensation
- DEIRDRE BENNETT (CHIEF FINANCE & ADMIN. OFFICER): $211,122 total reported compensation
- MEGAN ANNE CAMPBELL CHIEF (DEV./EXT. REL. OFF. THRU SEPT 2024): $143,480 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
For more than 30 years, heaf has delivered high-quality, tuition-free academic enrichment and career readiness programming for youth from under-resourced communities in New York city. Our proven pipeline supports students from middle school through college and into careers, cont'd.ensuring they have the skills, confidence, and networks to achieve long-term economic mobility.
What it reported doing in 2024
Heaf launched a pilot program in the fall to bring its college access programming directly into schools and community-based organizations. The heaf inspire initiative extends the core mission of the harlem educational activities fund (heaf) to partner schools and community-based organizations. Services provided by heaf included socio-emotional learning, college application support, and career exposure. In the spring, heaf launched a pilot program in collaboration with a public school, offering college- and career-readiness workshops with an emphasis on social and emotional learning for 5th graders.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 78.6%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -67.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.88; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 78.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $323K · 25 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $139K reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.