Harlem Academy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
562454573
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2123482600
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Primary, Elementary Schools

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,116,078
Expenses
$6,811,603
Assets
$47,557,131
Liabilities
$1,010,442

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

30 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • VINCENT DOTOLI (EX-OFFICIO/HEAD OF SCHOOL): $236,752 total reported compensation
  • KATHERINE STEINBACH (DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR): $185,274 total reported compensation
  • LEONARD SMITH (FINANCE DIRECTOR): $180,062 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Harlem academy drives equity of opportunity for promising children, guiding them to thrive at the highest academic levels and one day make a mark on the world.

What it reported doing in 2024

Commitment to low-income children. Harlem academy provides a full-need scholarship to 100% of enrolled students. The school is committed to a meritocracy where hard work drives the opportunity to realize potential, and no student is turned away for an inability to pay. Expanded enrollment. Since relocating to its permanent campus, harlem academy has increased enrollment from 102 in december 2021 to 182 students in september 2024, expanding access to a rigorous education for students whose potential might otherwise go unrealized. Secondary school placement. Ninety-two percent of eighth graders from the class of 2025 earned full-need scholarships to independent day and boarding schools. Students matriculated at schools including deerfield academy, greenwich country day school, kent school, miss porter's school, and northfield mount hermon, among others. College matriculation. One hundred percent of harlem academy alumni from the class of 2021 enrolled in four-year colleges. Students matriculated at institutions, including the college of the holy cross, howard university, smith college, spelman college, syracuse university, tulane university, university of Pennsylvania, and wesleyan university. Providing a model education. Harlem academy extends its impact by sharing best practices. Faculty and leadership have published 11 articles in education journals and related outlets, reaching educators, school leaders, and policymakers nationwide. Third-party recognition. Harlem academy earned charity navigator's four-star rating, candid's platinum seal of transparency, and the shield of protection from the beau biden foundation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 98
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 83%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 95.8%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 25.3%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.98; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63% of revenue deployed · 83% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 23 of 24 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $237K · 30 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.