Hard Luck Animal Welfare Advocates

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931456547
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
2096256425
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Veterinary Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,694,828
Expenses
$2,653,122
Assets
$242,234
Liabilities
$13,291

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Danielle Fusco (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Dr Mary Stice-Kishiyama (Veterinarian): $195,388 total reported compensation
  • Dr Stefanie Thielmann (Lead Veterinarian): $153,571 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our organizations mission is to provide access to veterinary medical care for our communitys most vulnerable pets. Hard Luck Animal Welfare Advocates has partnered with the City of Stockton to provide veterinary medical care to community animals at one of the highest volume shelters in California. Our non-profit organization is responsible for providing a full staff of veterinary professionals and support staff capable of administering all necessary medical care within the scope of the shelters capacity.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, Hard Luck Animal Welfare Advocates significantly expanded both the scale and impact of our program services, continuing our commitment to improving outcomes for Stocktons most vulnerable animals. Building on the foundation established in prior years, we broadened our operational reach by launching a dedicated Community Outreach Department, designed to increase visibility, strengthen community engagement, and ultimately drive higher adoption and live release rates.This expansion allowed us to deepen connections within the community through events, partnerships, and education, while also improving pathways for animals to move safely and efficiently out of the shelter system and into homes or rescue placement.A major milestone in 2025 was helping facilitate a key partnership that led to the acquisition of an additional 10,000-square-foot facility, which is being developed into the new shelters new Wellness & Community Center (WAC), set to open in Spring 2025. This center will serve as a hub for accessible veterinary care, community resources, and expanded programmingfurther strengthening the safety net for the communitys pets and their families.While construction of the shelters permanent medical facilities is still underway, our team adapted quickly to ensure continuity of care. Throughout much of 2025, our surgery team operated out of the new hospital space at the WAC, allowing us to maintain and grow our capacity for lifesaving medical interventions, including spay/neuter surgeries and critical care procedures.Supporting this growth is a robust and multidisciplinary team of more than 60 staff members, including veterinarians, registered veterinary technicians, veterinary technicians, foster and rescue coordinators, community outreach staff, customer service representatives, and administrative leadership. This structure reflects a comprehensive, team-based approach to animal welfareensuring that every stage of an animals journey, from intake to medical care to placement, is supported by dedicated expertise.The impact of these combined efforts is reflected in the years outcomes. In 2025, the shelter achieved a live release rate of over 84% for dogs and approximately 74% for cats, demonstrating meaningful progress in lifesaving efforts. Additionally, rescue and transfer partnerships accounted for over 34% of all outcomes, highlighting the strength of our collaborative network.With a total of more than 8,100 animals entering the shelter system in 2025, the need for comprehensive, scalable services remained high. Through strategic growth, operational flexibility, and community-centered programming, Hard Luck continued to meet this demand while driving improved outcomes across the board.As we look ahead, the expansion of our facilities and programs positions us to further increase access to care, reduce barriers to ownership, and create a more sustainable, humane system for animals and the people who love them.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.5%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 58.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 51.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.5% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $195K · 6 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $153K reported
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.